Take a dental clinic that exports Google Ads data to CSV every Monday and pastes it into ChatGPT. By the time the answers come back the numbers are a few days old, so live access sounds like the obvious upgrade. I'm not sure it always is. Pasting forces you to decide which columns and date range matter, and that choice is where most of the useful thinking happens. With live access the assistant picks its own slices, and it'll happily hand back a dozen tables you never asked for.
My view is that live data pays off when you're diagnosing something, like a sudden CPA jump. For the routine weekly review, I'd stick with a fixed export with the same columns every time, so this week compares cleanly to last week. Curious whether others have found the answers stay sharp when the AI can query everything.